Because IOB should be easy to find
Active insulin is part of the decision context. Keeping IOB visible helps the user review the situation they are actually considering.
MDI decisions rarely depend on one number. Bolus Master brings the surrounding context into view, shows how an estimate was assembled, records what actually happened, and helps you look back at what followed.
Active insulin is part of the decision context. Keeping IOB visible helps the user review the situation they are actually considering.
The user can see the mathematical components of the estimate instead of receiving an unexplained result.
The app preserves what the user reports actually doing, even when it differs from the original estimate.
History and retrospective review help users compare events and identify questions worth exploring.
Each part gives the user something useful in the moment and something worth revisiting later. The estimate, the logged action, the reminder, and the observation remain distinct.
See the context that is easy to lose.
Confirm glucose and trend from a connected CGM when available, or enter them manually. Add carbohydrates, meal timing, exercise, and the active user-configured context before reviewing an estimate.
Start with insulin on board beside glucose, trend, and meal context—not as a later lookup.
See how the math was assembled.
Review the visible components before acting. The calculation logic can stay collapsed for a clean page or expand intentionally so the user can inspect the mathematical breakdown rather than accept an unexplained result.
Keep active insulin visible as a component of the context while inspecting how the estimate was assembled.
Keep the record honest when plans change.
Log what the user actually took or did, even when it differs from the estimate. Meals can use None, Pre-bolus, Split dose, or Pre + split; correction-only entries use None, so no meal timer applies.
Record the actual dose and timing so the insulin-on-board context is easier to revisit rather than reconstruct from memory.
Turn records into better questions.
Review one event, compare similar events, or examine progress over time. Repetition may reveal an association worth exploring, but a single observation does not establish a pattern or prove why an outcome occurred.
Return to the recorded IOB context when reviewing later outcomes; it remains part of the trail, not proof of cause.
The decision trail stays distinct
The four steps keep inputs and settings, the estimate reviewed, the action logged, and the later outcome connected without pretending they are the same thing. An estimate is not a logged action, and an observation is not proof of causation. Personal settings, treatment values, and outcome records are not shared on this public website.
IOB is not an afterthought.
Bolus Master is shaped around the practical question that follows an earlier dose: what insulin on board is part of the context now? The app keeps logged insulin activity visible alongside the current inputs so the user can inspect the information present before reviewing an estimate.
This visibility supports review and logging. It does not guarantee that a record is complete, prevent an emergency, or replace an established care plan.
The estimate is based on the inputs and settings supplied by the user. Bolus Master keeps the mathematical breakdown available for intentional inspection, without presenting the estimate as an instruction or hiding the distinction between a calculation and an action.
Review before logging
The user remains the decision-maker.
Look at one event, compare similar events, or examine progress over time. Bolus Master keeps each level of review separate from prediction or treatment decision.
Single-event review
Review one meal, exercise session, or day using the available inputs, logged actions, notes, and later glucose data. It describes that event; it does not establish a pattern.
Repeated-pattern review
Place comparable recorded events side by side so recurring associations are easier to inspect. Repetition may support a useful question, but it does not prove why an outcome occurred.
AI-assisted organization
AI can summarize possible associations, surface questions, and help prioritize records for review. The user remains responsible for interpreting the information and deciding what to discuss with a qualified clinician.
AI-assisted summaries do not predict a glucose outcome, prove causation, prescribe treatment, or automatically change insulin settings. They organize recorded information for retrospective personal review.
If the visible decision trail makes sense—and you can see a place where your experience could make it stronger—request a place in the controlled peer-review cohort.
Read the safety and privacy boundary